PayPal

Monday, June 4, 2018

The Islamic Prime Minister


I sent this query to Theresa May at 10 Downing Street, London, a few days ago:


Is Theresa May a closet Muslim? Is she okay with female genital mutilation? Honor killings or murders?  The rapes of white British women and girls? Is she okay with Hamas? Hezbollah? Censorship?  With not giving Islam the raspberries? Not calling Islam totalitarian and evil? Would she have recommended to Hitler that members of The White Rose be executed? Or that Tommy Robinson be murdered by Muslim prisoners?

From all the evidence of the imposition of speech controls on Britain imposed by May, impositions punishable with arrest and imprisonment if the controls are violated, one can only make an educated guess that she is a closet Muslim.Sharia law is in the cards.

Recently, in the middle of last month, May answered a question in Parliament about freedom of speech as a “cherished” British liberty by qualifying her alleged value of it by stressing the role of “tolerance” as a kind of twin that puts a necessary gag the freedom. The implied object of the question was why criticism of Christianity was taken as a norm, but criticism of Islam was not.
May answered:

               “We value freedom of expression and freedom of speech in this country. That is absolutely essential in underpinning our democracy. But we also value tolerance to others. We also value tolerance in relation to religions. This is one of the issues that we’ve looked at in the counter-extremism strategy that the government has produced. I think we need to ensure that, yes, it is right that people can have that freedom of expression. But in doing so, that right has a responsibility, too. And that is a responsibility to recognize the importance of tolerance to others.”

Tolerance? Of what? Tolerance of Islam, to May, must mean not criticizing it or any of its primitive, medieval, and patently misogynic practices, such as FGM and rape at whim and by Koranic right. Throwing gays off of roofs. Jihad Watch cites a source of the Koranic sanction of rape:
Courtesy of  Peggy Traeger Tierney

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

ISIS and Islam in general have declared war on the West, a war that will never end until Islam is refuted as a “religion” that deserves “respect” and “tolerance.”

In August, ISIS detained more than 5,000 Yazidi women in northern Iraq after slaughtering thousands of members of the religious sect, according to the United Nations.

Younger girls were separated from older women, then bussed to the city of Mosul and put in a large three-story house with hundreds of other young women, according to a witness who spoke to CNN in November. ISIS men came periodically and chose up to three and four girls at a time to take home with them.

What is said in the Koran about rape? On this subject Theresa May is definitely not an “Islamophobe.” She strikes one as a kind of “Aunt Edna,” a frumpish woman of conventional tastes and values, a second-hander to the core. The overriding value today is “diversity, which she endorses, and  is a grab bag of cultural traditions and practices, for the sake of diversity, not letting one cultural tradition and practice become the norm in society.

There is Iran, which has jailed women who refused or discarded  their head scarves.

Fox News reported that May did not wear a head scarf when she visited Saudi Arabia in 2017:


British Prime Minister Theresa May, turned heads on Tuesday when she arrived in Saudi Arabia without wearing a headscarf – reportedly bucking the advice of her own government….

The photos showed May's ankles and wrists were covered. However, The Telegraph noted her outfit did not completely comply with Foreign Office guidelines:  “Women should wear conservative, loose-fitting clothes as well as a full length cloak (abaya) and a headscarf.”

But she certainly dons one when meeting with her British Muslim  “subjects.” Her “diversity” sympathies do not extend to Iranian women protesting the hijab.

The Arab News in January 2018 reported:

LONDON: Iranian opposition leaders in the UK are “disgusted” at the failure of British politicians, including Prime Minister Theresa May and Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn to condemn regime’s brutality as the death toll continues to climb seven days after protests began in Iran.

“Both the prime minister and the opposition party here have stayed completely silent when Iranian youth are being slaughtered in the streets of Iran,” said Laila Jazayeri, director of the Association of Anglo-Iranian Women in the U.K.

Theresa May invariably adopts a “What? Me, worry?” mien when the subject  of Islamic brutality at home and abroad arises, which is daily. It isn’t happening to her. The brutality occurs in a reality remote from her bubble of “diversity,” so there is an unreality to it, and she will utter platitudes and bromides present in the taquiyya spiel that any “radicalized“ iman or mullah will concoct for public consumption. It is a “prime directive” of hers to defend and protect the Islamic faith at any cost, because the altruist “moral imperative” of tolerance-through-diversity commands it. All Britons must adhere to it, or else be labeled as bigoted racists (even though a smidgen of awareness will reveal that Islam is not a race).

For all practical purposes, Theresa May is as Muslim as Sadiq Kahn, the mayor of London.  Is Sharia in the cards? No. She's already imposed it.

4 comments:

  1. Magnificent, Ed. May is deeply, deeply evil.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Linda Goudsmit, who was unable to post:

    Or perhaps Theresa May is so far to the Left she participates in the vile and seditious Leftist/Islamist axis that seeks to create enough chaos in Western host countries to make them ungovernable. The globalist elites who advocate global governance require the overwhelming chaos that mass Muslim immigration causes to prepare their countries for global governance - ruled by themselves of course. The problem for the Left and collectivist leaders like Theresa May is that Islamists don't see it her way - their idea of global governance is the imposition of religious sharia law and the establishment of an Islamist caliphate worldwide. Freedom of speech is dead in Britain. Theresa May has lead Britain into dhimmitude - just ask Tommy Robinson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent analysis. Theresa May probably believes this will never cost her anything more dire than having to tie a scarf around her head a few times a year. British women used to do that all the time -- even the Queen! What's the difference?
      But she will learn that there is a huge difference -- when, under the Shari'a, "conservative, loose-fitting clothes as well as a full length cloak (abaya) and a headscarf" become a requirement. No doubt she believes that will never happen. And so she does nothing to assure that it won't, as Islamic law slowly but inexorably settles over her country like some malevolent version of the infamous London "pea soup" fog.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for this article Edward. I see our own NZ word warrior Lindsay has planted an assertion which drags us away from the simplicity that May is just a stupid Aunt Edna. Your Aunt Edna reference led me across to this business of considering that she may be something more concerning than a second hand bag of diversity. . If ‘Diversity’ is evil by representing something admirable when it is in fact evil, then Lindsay is on the mark with that punishing summary. It doesn’t matter if she knows what she is doing or not. She even looks evil.
    It all brings me to my own core attitude. That Islamism is itself, a definable evil, and that we must take action further than writing to defeat it. Who will be the first to go down with a full blooded covert or open attack. Will that attack lead to even more totalitarian restrictions in the Orwellian nightmare . Yes. I say civil war must result, and that means guns, violence, death and to someone somewhere glory. Tommy Robinson is a modern day hero, he will become the stuff of legend and myth and I am proud of him . By the way, well done Lindsay Perigo on your great article Ding Dong the witch, the wicked witch Devoy is dead.

    ReplyDelete