Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Malice Aforethought, an Exercise in Impotence

It was educational to watch the audience during President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address in Congress the night of January 30th. The Democratic side of the House played dead.

The #Resistance is a hate group. It refuses to acknowledge the election of Donald Trump, even to the point of questioning his physical and mental fitness to be President, and includes in that mantra the implied accusation that Dr. Ronny Jackson, who examined Trump, is lying. It is willing to say anything to damage Trump, no matter how irrational outrageous and unproven. The “Resistance” goes further by attacking anyone associated by Trump, such as Nikki Haley, whom they suggested, was having an affair with him.  It was prime meat for the Dems but the rumor went nowhere. You can’t grow rain forest trees in the Gobi Desert.

Overall, the Dems during the SOTUS behaved so predictably anti-Trump that it was a foregone conclusion that they would put on anguished or sour faces when he listed his achievements over the last year:

 Reduced black and Hispanic unemployment figures
Two-point-four million new jobs
The Border wall
Merit –based immigration (and doing away with chain and visa immigration policies)
The ubiquity of bonuses for American employees (“crumbs” said Nancy Pelosi)
The decision to make Jerusalem the capital of Israel.
Ridding bureaucracies of unnecessary employees (an indirect assault on the Deep State)
Standing for the National Anthem (an assault on football’s “knee” stunts)

Many Democrats displayed frustration during Trump’s speech, refusing to applaud economic achievements, the dramatic reduction in black and Hispanic  unemployment, veterans and the parents of MS-13 victims. Most of them sat with hangdog expressions. They were sending Trump a message he already had and had expected that night. Nothing new. The Dems, in cooperation with the MSM and a multitude of pundits, have been flinging arrows at him for the last year and even before he won the election in November.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Democratic politician, walked out, wearing his African thingee on his shoulder, when the House GOPs chanted “USA! USA! USA!” in response to Trump’s statement that the Capitol Building was a monument to the American people. Few other Dems joined the Republicans. One may suppose they disagreed with Trump. The Capitol is supposed to be seen as a monument to these elected Social Justice Warriors, and the hard work they perform to transform the country from the freest republic in the world into a cesspool of collectivism, not to the hoi poloi.

Dems want the welfare state. Yearn for it. To better run and regulate the lives of millions of Americans. Their unspoken motto, in relation to uncontrolled, unlimited immigration, is that line from Kevin Costner’s fantasy “Field of Dreams”: “If you build one [a baseball field], they will come.” If you build a welfare state, countless parasites will flood across the borders, (not the ghosts of the late baseball legends). They will increase our voting blocs, garner us countless new grateful Democrats to expand our base, but, you the working American, will have no say in this, but have no choice but to pay for their illicit gold mine of freebees in education, incomes, and so on, not us. It’s difficult to get this point across to libertarians who foolishly call for “open borders” in the name of “freedom.”

All in all, Trump’s State of the Union address last night was encouraging if not thrilling. I sat
Never gives up, either
through the whole speech, glued to my chair. Some pundits are now saying that it was better than anything that Ronald Reagan ever said in that it gave the GOP some inspiration to get done what they need to do on all the subjects he discussed. Over the next year, the Democrats are going to get their butts laundered, although not by Trump.

The continuing, psychotic malice of the Dems and the MSM will be spent shooting more arrows at Trump. And one day their quiver of hatred will be empty.

Thursday, January 25, 2018

The OIC's Censorship

Thuggish organizations like Antifa do the grunt work and fist-swinging for the Organization of Islamic Conference (formerly Cooperation) OIC.  Masked and hooded, Antifa shuts down unwanted speech and speakers that question and reveal the Left’s totalitarian means and ends, and physically attacks its supporters. The OIC doesn’t need to send Islamic propagandists here, though it has a legion of them, such as CAIR, the ISNA, the MSA, and the ICNA. 

Clueless or indifferent social media owners do the work of Sharia and the OIC, too, such as Mark  Zuckerberg, who, among his many, many faults, promised Germany’s Angela  Markel  to help police the German Internet to crush criticism of her immigration policies.

Members of the OIC are definably criminal psychopaths. They want their Islamic/Sharia fantasies to come true, to show how Islam is “superior” to all other faiths and ideas, regardless; they wish their diktats about what may or may not be said (mostly may not) to come to fruition.  They work to impose Sharia on the West, and globally, for the sake of exerting power over their betters. Their demented reward is to feel omnipotence for having the West under their command. They’re akin to the mad scientist of the TV series “Gotham” who proves his electrical talents and his alleged existential efficacy by electrocuting people.

I made the remark on Gatestone that sentenced criminals in France pass on their jihadist philosophy to new criminals because being a criminal is copasetic to their approach to life and prison dawah would help to “justify” and understand a new prisoner’s incarceration.

Converting to Islam by prisoners is a way to rationalize one's criminal predilections and character.  "I rape women, rob people, and attack them."

The organization states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world" and works to "safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony"

Note that it is the “collective voice of the Muslim world,” and not of anyone else’s world or voice: only the Muslim worlds and voice.

Outspoken opponents of Islam and the Islamization of a Western country throughout Europe, in this case, Britain, are arrested, punished, and duct-taped to teach them and other opponents a lesson that one may not oppose the OIC with impunity. Britain First leader deputy Jayda Fransen gave her speech in Ireland and then was flown to Britain to face charges. In Finland, Finnish politician Sebastian Tynkkynen was arrested and fined for posting anti-Islam posts on Facebook. It was not the first time. If you endorse the OIC’s Sharia agenda, all you need to do is “complain” about someone’s social media post.  The pseudo-omniscient speech police will knock on the “offender’s” door and haul him away.

Western governments do the dirty business that the OIC does not want to risk performing itself. It might give everyone else the wrong impression that it is malign. It’s better to let Western governments to smash opponents in the name of “law and order.”

Meanwhile, in Germany's new censorship law, which has introduced state censorship on social media platforms, came into effect on October 1, 2017.

Barack Obama ordered that the DHS and other terrorism- fighting U.S. agencies remove all references to Islam from their documents.

Illegal immigrants a no-no term, according to CNN and MSNBC’s Joy Reid. The preferred term is “Dreamers.” The change in terminology is doubtless a side-effect of the OIC’s insistence of”correct” words. Doubtless those who regard “illegal immigrants” as derogatory and demeaning think that all people who enter and settle in the U.S ., especially if they are illegal, as being entitled to respect and rights.
The New York Times, friend of Dreamers, and Sharia

Obama coined the term “Dreamer” and it caught on with the MSM and the Democrats.

Obama was also President when two Muslims tried to attack the Garland, TX “Draw Mohammad” event on May 3, 2015. How committed to the Islamic and OIC agenda was he?  Was the attack a secret arrangement between Obama and FBI Director James Comey? Comey had been reinstated as FBI director by Obama in 2013 after occupying that office since 1972, and being reconfirmed by the Senate.

Given Obama’s demonstrable devotion to Islam is it too far-fetched to imagine that Comey “Green-Lighted” the Garland  attack, selecting a pliable FBI agent to communicate closely with the attackers?

Obama said,

In Cairo, at Cairo University, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” (speech to United Nations General Assembly, 2012-09-25)

So, the participants and planners of the Garland, TX drawing contest had to be taught a lesson. This could not help but please the OIC, except  that the attackers, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, were killed in the act. Comey had to have known what the agent, UCE-1 (and other agents) was up to. Had the attack been successful resulting in multiple casualties, would that have given Obama the excuse to ban all depictions of Mohammad, and impose censorship? Did he have knowledge of the FBI-ISIS partnership? Was UCE-1 a rogue FBI agent, with his own ax to grind?
Bosch Fawstin's winning image of Mohammad

On March 24, 2015, an undercover FBI agent (referred to by the FBI as ‘UCE-1’) contacted Hendricks on social media, posing as a Muslim who was interested in joining the ISIS cell.


Just before the event was set to begin, the FBI sent another email bulletin which contained ‘a list of suspected extremists who […] were interested in the event.’ The bulletin included information about ‘Simpson’s general interest’ in the event, along with a ‘photo and possible vehicle license plate,’ but it gave ‘no notice that he might be headed that way or planning an attack on the draw-Muhammad gathering.’ Former FBI Director James Comey would later claim that ‘[a]t the time, the FBI had no reason to believe that Simpson intended to attack the event.’ The Garland Police Department’s security operations for the event were already underway when the email bulletin was sent, and was ‘one of many emails sent [to the Department] on that day,” so “no one saw [the email] until after the attack.’ The numerous FBI agents on the ground at the event made no effort to alert local law enforcement officials that Simpson posed an imminent threat.”

Simpson was under surveillance by the FBI, but its agents had no reason to alert local law enforcement or the event?

Was UCE-1 the only rogue FBI agent present at the Garland event? Just how many members of the ISIS-friendly FBI were there in the vicinity? Did they belong to the “secret society” that has just been revealed? How many still work for the FBI? Possibly there is an obscure Federal law that indemnifies agents in the course of their lawful duties (protecting the agents from lawsuits, while working to protect the U.S. and its citizens). But I don’t think there is a law that indemnifies agents who commit treason and sic Muslim agents on Americans. UCE-1 emailed Simpson, “Tear up Texas!”

The whole FBI role in the Garland attack is shocking and an eye-opener. UCE-1 should be identified and sent to prison, together with Comey and Obama.

Monday, January 22, 2018

The Venom of the SPLC

The “Palestinians” are a hate group. Across the board in Gaza and the West Bank and elsewhere, they call for killing Jews and destroying the State of Israel.  

The #Resistance is a hate group. It refuses to acknowledge the election of Donald Trump, even to the point of questioning his physical and mental fitness to be President, and includes in that mantra the implied accusation that Dr. Ronny Jackson, who examined Trump, is lying. It is willing to say anything to damage Trump, no matter how irrational and unproven.

Antifa is a hate group. The visual evidence is ample. Masked thugs attack individuals who want to see and hear someone the group disapproves of; destroy property with glee, and calls “fascist” (as though the thugs knew what real “fascists” were in the past) anyone who opposes them.  Antifa thugs should take Pogo’s complaint to heart;”We have seen the enemy and he is us.” Not that doing such would give them second thoughts. Their minds are the property of leftist ideology.

Democratic congressmen who oppose President Trump comprise a hate group.

Any group that does not disavow its unremitting, obsessive hatred for Trump is a hate group.

Yet it will not be classified as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).  This and other groups  get a free pass because they hate Trump and spew their hatred to another level of ranting insanity. My argument is that any government authority that suppresses freedom of speech across the globe is a “hate group,” any group that offers “resistance” to freedom of speech is a “hate group,” any individual who rants irrationality against President Trump is a one-man “hate group” and could said to be in the grip of “Trumpophobia.”

The Democratic Party
Like the saliva of an Indonesian Komodo dragon injected into a bite victim, the toxin is supposed to cause a fatal and a certain, helpless death. The dragons are attracted to the putrefaction of the bodies of their victims. Much as the Democrats are.

Articles have surfaced that claim that the SPLC is by definition a “hate group” itself, because its chief purpose today is to establish and publish lists of names that hate groups can target for hateful action. This is a charge which cannot be denied by the SPLC. Virtually the only time it makes news headlines today is
when it has declared certain individuals – such as Pamela Geller, Richard Spencer, Ayaan Hirsi Ali – and numerous blogs that critique Islam, as “Islamophobes” or as “hate groups.” They commit “hate crimes” and must be sent to the slammer. Never mind that Geller is under a constant fatwa to behead her, that Spencer was poisoned in Iceland, and that Hirsi Ali survived the worst of Sharia for a woman, female genital mutilation.

So, what is a “hate crime”?

A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is a prejudice-motivated crime, usually violent, which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.

Examples of such groups can include and are almost exclusively limited to: sex, ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation. Non-criminal actions that are motivated by these reasons are often called "bias incidents".

"Hate crime" generally refers to criminal acts which are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse or insults, mate crime or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).

What is “Islamophobia”? What is the term’s origin?

The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad -- who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT's ideology -- now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.

The SPLC and its cultural kin would say, “Our hate is legitimate, and justified. It’s for a universal, humanitarian purpose.” In practice and in fact, it is a tool and a weapon to denigrate anyone who questions the “peaceful” ends of Islam, and is who is critical of its totalitarian designs and methods. Anyone who has bothered to examine Islam would almost evidently fear it and not conclude it was just another “belief system.”  It would be as much as examining a rattlesnake.

The SPLC apparently is not bothered by being labeled a “hate group.” Leftists are, by their nature, not chagrined or embarrassed by the charge of being totalitarian.

The IPT map of SPLC designated targets
The trick the SPLC plays is to group legitimate criticism with actual hate groups and hope readers do not wonder why Pamela Geller is linked to the likes of the Skinheads, the Neo-Nazis, and the KKK.

The venom of the SPLC suits the MSM because they don’t need to do anything. It fits their agenda. The SPLC has done the “research” for them. If the SPLC says an individual or group is driven by hate, that’s the end of their inquiry, other than perhaps taking a brief glance at the targeted site to confirm that what they see they don’t like and would prefer to see prohibited and outlawed. Facts. Reason.  Logic. Cause-and-effect.  Syllogisms.  

These are all minefields, and any one, of them, if stepped on by Dems, will explode their arguments and their assumed intellectual acuity (if they possess any), and expose their substance of straw and old rags and habitual dissembling lizards. Dems are “fake persons” and “fake” Congressional representatives. The Dems were in favor of perpetuating slavery during and after the Civil War up to the present. They continue to perpetuate it.

They can always depend on “party-loyalty” for votes.

Saturday, January 20, 2018

Totalitarians vs. Deplorables

Courtesy of Pamela Geller
 and The
Religion of Peace

As an atheist I don’t pal around with very many Christians. I know plenty of non-practicing Jews. But I know no Muslims personally. To me, God has the same reality as does Allah, which is no reality at all. He has less substance than a Martian cloud.

Yet, I still feel compassion for Christians and Jews being persecuted by Muslims. They just want to be left alone to utter their hosannas.  I do not frequent churches or synagogues; because these are not places I’m likely to encounter any intellectual discourse. However, the ongoing decimation of Jews and Christians at the hands of Muslims goes virtually unnoticed and reported by the MSM—in the Mideast and in France and practically any place you care to name.  

I grew up in a Catholic home, so anti-Semitism has always been completely alien to me. It has a dozen or more bogus rationalisms to explain or justify it. “Jews are taking over the world. Jews run the banking business. Jews want the blood of your children. Jews this and Jews that, they’re to blame for your misery.”  I guess an anti-Semite will claim that Jews exterminated the Martians, too. The most ludicrous instance of anti-Semitism is the Russian propaganda of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Reading through it I got the sense that I was reading a pretty awful science fiction novel or a Hollywood script.

The totalitarians in our midst, such as Senator Chuck Schumer, want you to obey, not call him names, and just let him have his way with you and the rest of the country. Speaking of deplorables:

Please, please! Melt the ice!

Close to science fantasy and the elevation of the omniscient–ill feelings of a cackling bogeyman are the current and unshakable anti-Trump mentality of the MSM and the daily utterances of the political establishment, such those by Jeff Flake and Corey Booker.

Outgoing Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake came under fire for an astonishing attack on President Trump Wednesday, in which he accused Trump of using Stalinist language and promoting global instability with his criticism of the media.

‘Comparing the leader of the free world to murderous dictators is absurd," Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel tweeted. "You’ve gone too far."

But Jeff Flake, a surely appropriately named U.S. senator, was rebutted:

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders shot back at the daily press briefing that Flake had recently visited Cuba, where he had nice things to say about the authoritarian government in that country.

“I found it quite interesting that he is coming out to attack this president considering he's the one who was recently defending an actually oppressive regime. He went to Cuba a few weeks ago and served as a mouthpiece for the oppressive Cuban government.”

She also blamed Flake’s low poll numbers for his attacks on Trump. Flake announced in October that he will not seek re-election in 2018.

Sanders could have called Flake to her podium and in front of everyone called him an idiot to his face.  That would have been better desserts.

In the meantime, Corey Booker shed tears and  many calories to insult and attack the head of the DHS:

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) lashed out at female DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen on Tuesday, lambasting the secretary as "complicit," in an emotional outburst that saw Booker flail about and scream at Nielsen in disgust — even suggesting she had limited intellectual capabilities.
But yet, Democrats, who turned Sens. Kamala Harris (CA) and Elizabeth Warren (MA) into cult heroes for enduring a fraction of the abuse Nielsen handled during her grilling at Booker's hands, were completely silent on Booker's unprofessional treatment of Nielsen.

“When…Dick Durbin called me, I had tears of rage when I heard about this experience in that meeting. And for you not to feel that hurt and that pain — and to dismiss some of the questions of my colleagues saying, ‘I already answered that line of questions’ — when tens-of-millions of Americans are hurting right now […] that’s unacceptable to me,” Mr. Booker said.

I will brainwash Germans,
    They’ll hug Muslims,
        or I'll jail them!
Perhaps you’ve seen better dramatics in a daytime soap opera. You must ask yourself: Is there no level to which politicians and the MSM will stoop to remove Trump from an office he has clearly deserved to occupy? Apparently not. I have searched for the bottom, but found only sand, sharks, and feeders.

Michael Walsh commented on the all-purpose, teeny, epileptic vocabulary  of Trump’s enemies:

Note the profusion of headlines these days that now include “sources say,” “seems to suggest,” “may,” “reportedly,” and other weasel words whose plain meaning is not. The great scheisshole flap originated with exactly one individual, the proven fabulist Dick Durbin of Illinois, but now has been accepted as gospel by (as Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, says) the Democratic operatives with bylines. And the great “Russian collusion” hoax—which I pointed out from day one was a disinformation operation facilitated by rogue, but high-ranking, members of the intelligence community, the Democrats, the Clinton campaign, and their hacks and fellow-travelers in the media—has now gossamered away in the wind, having largely been supplanted by 25th Amendment fantasies, Michael Wolff’s book, and temper tantrums over Norway and the new tax tables. 

He has clocks on his socks?
That’s enough to finish him!
Mueller to barking up the wrong tree!
The only thing that might lower the perpetual hate-Trump fever today would be an assassination. The Dems and the MSM would shed ample crocodile tears but perform Dionysian dances behind the scenes, though perhaps not; they have dropped all pretence of public decorum. They not have quite called Dr. Jackson a liar or a tool of the Trump “conspiracy” to prove that they is more fit to be President than your average journalist.

Speaking of madness, Al Gore is doing global warming dances in the freezing cold. Now that the Fusion and Russian dossier issue are more or less  kaput he’s going to have to find a new job, perhaps as a golf caddy or as a dishwasher in a Washington diner.