Sunday, July 31, 2016

We Don’t Want You to Know

Let’s now turn to the deliberate manipulation or obfuscation or suppression of official reporting on crimes committed by “migrants” (aka Muslims) in the U.S. and in Europe, such as the recent rape of a 5-year-old girl in Idaho by “underage” Muslim boys in Idaho.

Davis Odell, a community resident who has been in close contact with the victim’s family said the boys dragged the unnamed girl into a utility room in the Fawnbrook Apartments, a low-income, subsidized housing complex in Twin Falls, and assaulted her in an attack that ended when a neighbor happened upon the scene and called police….

Twin Falls Police Chief Craig Kingsbury told reporters the suspects are Iraqi and Sudanese. [County Prosecutor Grant] Loebs said he does not know how long they have been living in the United States.

Twin Falls activists say the case and the lack of information from authorities demonstrates the problem with state and federal programs to resettle refugees in cities and towns.

The local police hemmed and hawed about the character of the crime and dragged their feet on the exact identity of the perpetrators. Residents brow-beat the chief of police, but it was clear that the police were under higher authority pressure to not be forthcoming with the truth lest it reflect badly on “migrants” resettled at the behest of the Obama administration. Shades of the Rotherham sex slave and prostitution ring in Britain, a ring that was run for years with impunity by Muslims. IPT reported that “Between 1997 and 2013, well before the recent mass migration to Europe began, an estimated 1,400 children had been sexually abused in Rotherham, England, predominantly by gangs of British-Pakistani men.”

At a City Council meeting Monday night, residents demanded answers from law enforcement regarding the crime and the resettlement program, with some calling for the removal of all immigrants in the city.

And the much touted and feared “backlash” against resettled (or shall we say forced integration of Americans with hostile Muslims) never came to Twin Falls or anywhere else, except sporadically in Europe with the setting fire to “resettlement” housing. Steve Emerson of IPT reports that the censoring and suppression of information about the migrant crime rates in Germany and Sweden is “justified” by backlash fears.

Authorities now believe that more than 1,200 women were sexually assaulted – more than twice the original estimate of 500. While more than 2,000 men were allegedly involved, only 120 suspects — about half of them recently arrived migrants — have been identified.

One explanation for why it took half a year for the full extent of the crime to be revealed is the German police's effort to avoid a public backlash against refugees. But ultimately, Holger Munch, president of the German Federal Crime Police Office, acknowledged to the German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung that there is "a connection between the [sexual assaults] and the rapid migration in 2015." [The police in all countries invaded by the “migrants” are under orders by the governments to under-report, or not report at all, or to dismiss women’s complaints about rapes and send the women away, or to punish them further for committing slander against Muslims and migrants.]

See also Daniel Greenfield’s article “New War Crimes in Germany.”

The majority of the Muslim rapists came from North African countries. Half of them had been in Germany for less than one year. If there were a UN tribunal to be held for the war crimes committed by Muslim migrants against European women, Frau Merkel should be sitting in the dock.

It was her decision to open the borders that led to the horror inflicted on 1,200 women in one night.

And 1,200 women is just a single episode. We don’t know the full total numbers. And we may never know them. Yet at this rate it’s entirely possible that the total of Merkelicide might exceed even the wildest inflated estimates from the Bosnian war. And yet it’s considered indelicate to discuss such things because this time around Muslims aren’t the victims, they are the perpetrators.

In Sweden, rape statistics are deliberately buried in order not to alarm the public. Gatestone reports:

  • Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa.
  • Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes.
  • In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to have sex with six, seven or eight men.
  • The internet radio station Granskning Sverige called the mainstream newspapers Aftonbladet and Expressen to ask why they had described the perpetrators as "Swedish men" when they actually were Somalis without Swedish citizenship. They were hugely offended when asked if they felt any responsibility to warn Swedish women to stay away from certain men. One journalist asked why that should be their responsibility.
So, the question is: Why don’t the authorities want the public to know the extent of crime committed by Muslims on Westerners? There is the standard “backlash” argument, which culminates in a single person leaving a slab of bacon on the doorknob of a mosque or even a pig’s head on a mosque doorway. However, the “backlash” is wholly Muslim in nature with regular violent riots of Muslims in France amounting to running battles between Muslims and the police.

The attitude seems to be: “We don’t want Americans attacking Muslims or migrants because they might fight back, causing a civil war we neither want nor would be able to  control without siding with the victims (that is, with the Muslims, not with their victims). After all, it’s wrong to hate Muslims, just because a few of them commit horrendous crimes. The crimes they are responsible for have nothing to do with their faith (Islam). That is the official stance from the imperial seat of power and we the local police are not going to buck it or resist it.  We are not here to formulate or redefine immigration or foreign policy, not to pass judgment on Islam or on savage foreigners. We are here to uphold the law as it has been prescribed on high.”

This is what Ayn Rand would call massive “blanking out” and an evasion of reality and facts, which condemns a man to a mental state lower than that of a Muslim. Men who practice it should be relieved of their law enforcement duties without severance pay and run out of the town or country they refused to protect. “We don’t want you to know about how bad it is,” such a person chews in his mind, “because then you’d be upset and angry we’d need to do something about it and that would cause trouble. All we want is the passive serenity of not judging anyone except for a ‘white privileged’ victim when she defames her rapist or attacker. We don’t want the responsibility. We don’t want to know and we’d prefer you not to know.”

It’s called faking reality as an operative policy. Forcing the authorities to face reality now will draw one punishment and penalties. Actual perpetrators, if their crimes cannot be ignored, if they are judged at all, will get off lightly. The fakers of reality commit fraud and have a vested interest in keeping you ignorant.
The Muslim Clown can always rely on the police to protect him.

Knowledge can be a dangerous thing, especially for those who don’t want to be bothered with it. Being a moral man is just too much of a burden for the non-judger.

I contend that any man who subscribes to such an anti-mind philosophy is sub-human.


  1. In full agreement with the above.
    I just hope as these acts continue to spread to the point the stories can no longer be repressed it causes enough people to wake up before it is to late.

    Unrelated to the article a question for you Mr.Cline.
    My copies of the last few volumes of sparrowhawk just came in.
    I was surprised to see the 5th volume did not feature the same picture of you on the back as all the others.

    Attached is a copy.

    Is this even you?
    Do you have any idea why one single volume features a different picture. Even the sparrowhawk companion has the same portrait as the others.

    Also, I was hoping you would someday write another piece regarding trump. Specifically the objectivist viewpoint on him.
    Increasingly in past months I have seen more and more objectivist sources blasting trump, as no better then hilary. Its surprising to me you seem to be the only Rand fan, who is more sympathetic to his candidacy.

    Some examples of what i have been reading are below

  2. The picture is from my Facebook page. I decided to use another image, that's all.

    I used to post articles on Capitalism Magazine. But I'm no longer welcome there because of the article I wrote on Bruce Jenner some time ago.

  3. See

    Readers not only were "outraged" by the article, but also by the illustration, so the host kicked me off the site and archived all my past columns (that is, hid them). I no longer read the site.

  4. I just read through the article you posted.
    I will say I don't agree with everything in it, though I certainly wasn't outraged by it either, and agree with many of it's points.

    That said, this was a piece focused on attention seeking transgender types like Jenner. May I ask what your opinion on run of the mill gay or lesbian types are? I know many gay conservatives for example. Do you believe you cannot be gay and be an objectivist for example? Again, i am asking about normal gay or bi folks, not transgender nonsense.

    On a different note, are you aware that Bruce Jenner is actually quite hated these days by the regressive left? Bruce even in his new "female" form is actually a rather large conservative on many issues, and even backs trump. Does this change your view at all?

  5. Nothing has changed my view of Jenner, who seems now to regret his Catlyn status and wants to go back to being a man. He was a damned fool to put himself and everyone else through his nonsense, and it helped to propel the whole gender neutral bathroom BS. His behavior was just a highly publicized attack on the law of identity. That's what my enemies on Capitalism Magazine failed to recognize or refused to recognize. One of them, I think Dr. Hurd, lead the charge, and possibly persuaded the host of CapMag to diddle with Rule of Reason to take down the Jenner article. He more or less admitted to the attempted censorship, which was unforgivable.